عنوان مقاله [English]
Our country's registration regulations in the field of delimitation operations have several shortcomings. Accordingly, this article deals with the pathology and recognition of registration regulations and solutions to mofidy the defects in them in the context of the said operations, as one of the important stages in the preliminary operations of property registration.
Based on the results of this research, from the perspective of pathology and recognition of defects in registration regulations, the title of delimitation operations and related titles, ie demarcation minutes and delimitation advertisements, are incomplete and does not indicate on their subject, which in addition to limits, Includes rights; In consequence, the definitions of these titles from this perspective and based on their scope of subject are incomplete and should be expanded. Also, the subject and scope of delimitation operations in the general sense of the word do not include all the necessary items in the registration of property at this stage; Consequently, regulations related to the scope of protest against the mentioned operation and the beneficiaries are also incomplete in this regard. There are some ambiguities and shortcomings in the regulations regarding the implementation of the delimitation operations.
In regard to modifying the identified deficiencies, the title of "restrictive operation" and related titles should be changed to "Advertisement for Determining limits and Rights", "Operation for Determining limits and Rights" and "Minutes for Determining limits and Rights", respectively. Based on the modification of their title, the scope and subject should be modified. Also, the subject and scope of the operations of determining the limits and rights in the general sense, as well as the scope of the subject of the objection, should be expanded from the perspective of rights and beneficiaries in this field,. In regard to how to carry out the delimitation operation and the rights, the necessity of posting an advertisement will be considered as a rule in all cases, and in regard to the absence of persons except for the registration applicant, whose absence does not preclude action, other cases will be subject to the legal rule of renewal of limits and rights operations.