The dispute of the holder of a regular and official document is a familiar name in the Iranian legal system and has a history of one hundred years in the Iranian legal system. Which group is really right? What can be understood from legal writings shows the endless nature of this conflict. The dispute over the holder of a regular and official document is a familiar name in the Iranian legal system and has a history of one hundred years in the Iranian legal system. Which group is really right? What can be understood from legal writings indicates that this dispute is endless. Judicial procedure, in complete harmony with this endless litigation, had chosen two different methods. On this basis, achieving uniformity of method, or in other words, finding an answer to the question of how to discover the owner of immovable property, had become an unattainable ideal. But suddenly, with the coming into effect of the law requiring the official registration of immovable property transactions approved on 26/2/1403, the Expediency Discernment Council was given a bright light, and the legislator stopped talking nonsense and, for the first time in the last hundred years, joined a group that considers the owner to be the holder of the official document. Of course, in order not to be accused of biased bias, he also proposed a stepping stone for the holder of the ordinary document and named it “the price dispute at the daily rate” in order to create a permanent reconciliation between the two. An institution that will be analyzed in depth in this article to answer the question, among other things, whether this transformation was accidental or a small part of a fundamental paradigm in Iranian law.